Fireworks Performance and AntiVirus Software

There has been a few threads in the Adobe Fireworks forum recently where some users were hav­ing per­for­mance issues with Fireworks on Windows machines. Most of the time, their prob­lems can be traced back to their using either Norton or McAfee antivirus soft­ware. Both of those are noto­ri­ous resources hogs that use ungodly amounts of RAM and CPU power and slow down people’s computers, even with today’s pow­er­ful hardware.

I have used both antivirus soft­ware in the past and can vouch from expe­ri­ence that they can bring a com­puter down to its keens in terms of performance. This was sev­eral years ago when com­put­ers were already much slower than today but it seems not much has changed since then. You would think that both AV soft­ware ven­dors would have improved the well known and doc­u­mented per­for­mance issues with their offer­ings but it seems that the same prob­lems their users were fac­ing 8 to 10 years ago are still present today. If at least those appli­ca­tions were actu­ally good at what they were cre­ated to do (find­ing and remov­ing viruses) then you might for­give a per­for­mance hit but every shootout or test I have read in the last 2 or 3 years shows that they are barely ade­quate at their pri­mary task.

If you are also hav­ing per­for­mance issues with Fireworks or any other appli­ca­tion and you are using either Norton or McAfee prod­ucts, I would strongly advise that you re-​examine your choice and look for other and bet­ter alter­na­tives. After hav­ing tried count­less antivirus pack­ages and researched the issue thor­oughly, I set­tled on Eset’s NOD32 about 3 years ago and I have had no prob­lem what­so­ever since then. NOD32 has the small­est resources foot­print of all antivirus soft­ware but also the best detec­tion and removal track record. It won’t slow down your sys­tem and will not hin­der your email appli­ca­tion. It’s really well worth the price.

Another very good alter­na­tive is AVG AntiVirus wich I ran before NOD32. They also have a free ver­sion with most of the pro version’s features.

If you are using Norton or McAffee prod­ucts, you owe it to your­self to try bet­ter alter­na­tives and regain your system’s power and per­for­mance, espe­cially if your reg­u­larly use resources inten­sive graph­ics appli­ca­tions like Fireworks or any other sim­i­lar soft­ware. Don’t just take my word for it, try them…

9 Responses to Fireworks Performance and AntiVirus Software
  1. Jorge Tejada
    August 14, 2007 | 6:08 pm

    I rec­om­mend Kaspersky Antivirus 6.0

  2. Stéphane
    August 15, 2007 | 9:08 am

    Ok… Any spe­cific rea­son why? Have you ever tried other antivirus soft­ware? If yes, which ones?

    Thanks for your comment!

  3. Michel
    August 21, 2007 | 7:08 am

    May sound strange, but at the office I use cur­rently Norton AntiVirus 2003, and don’t see any per­for­mance issues, nor with Fireworks, nor with other pro­grams… (Pentium-​D 2.8GHz, 1 gig DDR667).

    At home I use BitDefender now, it’s not bad, quite light­weight, but some­times gives prob­lems (like pre­vents pro­grams writ­ing into reg­istry some­times, which results in errors, etc.) …

    NOD32 I didn’t test, yet.

    Thx for the recommendations!

  4. Stéphane
    August 21, 2007 | 7:08 am

    You’re lucky then Michel because that hasn’t been my expe­ri­ence on sev­eral machines. Admittedly though, my expe­ri­ence with Norton and McAfee on my own com­put­ers date back sev­eral years but here at the office, we were using Norton until early 2006 when we switched to Trend Micro. This has improved per­for­mance quite a bit here.

    Hopefuly Norton has improved its prod­uct in the last few years or hard­ware has just become pow­er­ful enough that you don’t feel the strain on resources as much as we did years ago. But usu­ally, the dif­fer­ence becomes quite appar­ent when you install another AV. After Norton I went through a year with F-​Prot, 3 with AVG and am now on my sec­ond year with NOD32. Until I bought my new machine recently, all were used on the same hard­ware, includ­ing Norton in 2001 – 2002 so I could really tell the difference.

    If you are ever in need of renew­ing your AV soft­ware sub­scrip­tion, really give NOD32 a try before renew­ing your exist­ing prod­uct. I’m con­vinced you’ll be able to tell the difference.

  5. Michel
    August 21, 2007 | 7:08 am

    Thx for the recommendations!

    Actually (I know it’s not very polite of me, but…) when 12-​months sub­scrip­tion of NAV 2003 expires, some­times all you need is re-​install it and you have another 12 months ;-)

    I don’t know if this is OK, but because it WORKS with no tricks, no hacks, then I sim­ply use it with no wor­ries at all:)

    BitDefender was a present from a friend of mine (he had 2 licenses and gave one to me) and it’s quite good. NOD32 I’ll maybe try. Is it expen­sive? :-)

    Cheers, M.

    [PS Did you get a mes­sage from me from your con­tact form?…]

  6. Stéphane
    August 21, 2007 | 9:08 am

    Look at my lat­est blog post ;-)

  7. Michel
    August 22, 2007 | 6:08 am

    Oh, already saw it! Miracle! :-)

    I’ll test some more… but I much much hope this will help me in most of the cases I expe­ri­enced this FW bug with the blurry stroke effect… :)

    Thx, Stephane!

    It’s great there are peo­ple like you! :-)

  8. Keith Bennett
    April 30, 2010 | 8:28 pm

    Good stuff STÉPHANE. I inher­ited a pretty new com­puter with Norton. I am in Southern California and I have heard of this anti-​virus before on a com­puter show here. The radio guy, Leo, used the term “No Open Doors” to remem­ber the acronym NOD. I am going to bite the bul­let, take your advice get NOD this evening. Will book­mark your site too. — Keith Southern California

  9. Stéphane
    April 30, 2010 | 11:53 pm

    Awesome Keith! Although this is a cou­ple years old, I still use NOD32 and still rec­om­mend it heartily. I don’t think you’ll be dis­ap­pointed with it. On the other hand, good luck remov­ing Norton from that new com­puter ;)

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?