Fireworks is alive!

Well, it seems that my tim­ing for the pub­li­ca­tion of the “Why Choose Fireworks” arti­cle was even bet­ter than I though… Danielle Beaumont the new Fireworks Product Manager at Adobe just posted a mes­sage to the Fireworks forum stat­ing that Fireworks was still an impor­tant prod­uct for them and, more impor­tantly, that it was still under active devel­op­ment… She even men­tions that they’ll still need users help for pre-​release (beta) test­ing. That is really awe­some news! Go read it now!

That should finally shut up Fireworks’ doomsayers…

That news just made my day… well that and some­thing else I’ll post about later ;-)

6 Responses to Fireworks is alive!
  1. stephane
    February 14, 2006 | 9:02 am

    Most excel­lent news!!! Photoshop should be left to print and video, and ImageReady should be ter­mi­nated. It was a hack to make a print-​oriented beast a web tool. Now that it’s no longer needed, it should die, and Photoshop can stop pre­tend­ing to be what it’s not.

  2. Joey33
    February 22, 2006 | 6:02 pm

    Hi,
    Read your arti­cle on ‘why choose Fireworks…’ and it really raised my spir­its;) I’d been liv­ing in the shad­ows of com­plexes about not hav­ing bucks for pho­to­shop and so being ‘made’ to use Fw until the arti­cle helped me broaden my see­ing a bit.
    I’ve always thought that some things are just eas­ier for me to do in Fw and I’ve been really think­ing hard why, actu­ally, folks wor­ship Ps. I’ve never aired my views just not be a wierdo. I think Ps has a great deal of com­mer­cial pro­pa­ganda behind the scene and peo­ple choose to use it because it is the ‘stan­dard’ and so they leave Fw behind, with­out actu­ally giv­ing a try.
    This arti­cle should be read by webdesigners-​to-​be in the first place.
    Thanks for refresh­ing the emo­tional links with my work­shop soft­ware;) bye­bye
    Joey (from Poland)

  3. Marje
    March 12, 2006 | 5:03 am

    I am thrilled to read this. I am a HUGE PhotoShop fan … have been using it daily for 12 years. But for web work, Fireworks is far far superior.

    Bravo!

  4. Terry Sebastian
    March 29, 2006 | 4:03 pm

    I can’t imag­ine using any­thing other than fire­works for design­ing web pages. I don’t even use pho­to­shop anymore.

  5. Thomas
    September 13, 2006 | 3:09 pm

    Ditto Terry’s com­ments. I can’t remem­ber the last time I “needed” Photoshop for com­plex bitmap work — I’m not into high-​end pho­tog­ra­phy, print or image work, just web­sites and basic graphic design.

    I’ve been using Fireworks since I can remem­ber, and would hate to have to migrate to Photoshop … it was unin­stalled long ago.

  6. Leigh
    October 2, 2006 | 6:10 pm

    Backing the new Fireworks!
    I’m luckly on the BETA Team! :]

    See you around,

    Leigh.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?